He then stuffs the bread beneath his jacket. Being concise is particularly important in exams when you have time limits to separate students into into credit, distinction and high distinction categories.
In addition to these elements, it may help you to organize your thoughts, as some people do, by dividing Facts into separate elements: 1 Facts of the case what actually happened, the controversy 2 Procedural History what events within the court system led to the present case 3 Judgment what the court actually decided Procedural History is usually minimal and most of the time irrelevant to the ultimate importance of a case; however, this is not always true.
In exams, it will come down to practice, so make sure you run through as many practice exams as you can to find out the best structure for any particular question exam topics are frequently repeated so you can figure out what will be on your exam early.
For example in cases involving detention by an officer of the law, courts have ruled that the officer has to have both just cause and authority. In my defence it was early on in my first year fine — second half of my first year.
Similar to the issue section, limit it to one sentence and spend your effort on the far more important analysis section — this is where all the marks lie.
Although you'd probably be penalized for that organizational strategy on most law exams, it's actually superior to IRAC for other types of writing.
This section will describe the parts of a brief in order to give you an idea about what a brief is, what is helpful to include in a brief, and what purpose it serves. It is what opinions do: they apply rules to facts to resolve legal issues.